TaxProf Blog

Editor: Paul L. Caron
Pepperdine University School of Law

A Member of the Law Professor Blogs Network

Monday, May 21, 2007

Supreme Court Grants Cert in Davis, Which Prohibits Tax Exemption for In-State Municipal Bond Interest

The Supreme Court today granted certiorari in Department of Revenue v. Davis, No. 06-666.  In Davis v. Kentucky, 197 S.W. 3d 557 (2006), the Kentucky Court of Appeals held unconstitutional under the dormant commerce clause Kentucky's tax exemption of interest on Kentucky state & local bonds, but not interest on out of state bonds.

Also on the Davis front:  Ethan Yale (Georgetown) & Brian Galle (Florida State) have posted their forthcoming article, Municipal Bonds and the Dormant Commerce Clause After United Haulers, 114 Tax Notes ___ (5/29/07), on SSRN.  Here is the abstract:

This Report considers the constitutionality of the common state practice of exempting interest on the state's own municipal bonds from taxation but imposing tax on municipal bonds issued in other states. In particular, we weigh the impact of a recent Supreme Court decision, United Haulers, on challenges to those statutes, including one suit, Davis v. Kentucky, in which a petition for certiorari is now pending. In United Haulers the Court held that a municipal ordinance didn't violate the Dormant Commerce Clause because the ordinance operated as a preference for a government-owned facility. United Haulers might save from constitutional invalidity state tax laws favoring in-state municipal bonds, but we doubt it. Although United Haulers lifts the presumption of unconstitutionality from laws favoring state-run businesses in competition with private business, we argue that the Court should remain skeptical of discriminatory laws that shield state officials from the pressure of competition with activities undertaken by other states. We predict that, if constitutional law remains as it stands, state laws exempting only in-state municipal bonds will be found to violate the Dormant Commerce Clause. If we are wrong and state tax laws favoring in-state municipal bonds are shielded by United Haulers, it will mark a significant extension of the nascent state-run business exception to the Dormant Commerce Clause.

Press coverage:

Prior TaxProf Blog coverage:

http://taxprof.typepad.com/taxprof_blog/2007/05/supreme_court_g.html

New Cases | Permalink

TrackBack URL for this entry:

http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c4eab53ef00d83545a2d053ef

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Supreme Court Grants Cert in Davis, Which Prohibits Tax Exemption for In-State Municipal Bond Interest:

» Round-Up: Today's Orders & Opinions from SCOTUSblog
In the Wall Street Journal, Mark H. Anderson and Michael A. Pollock report here (subscription req'd) on today's opinions in Bell Atlantic and Winkelman and the Court's decision to review Kentucky Department of Revenue v. Davis, a municipal bond case.... [Read More]

Tracked on May 21, 2007 3:34:46 PM

» A Big Case for the Supreme Court Later this Year from Taxable Talk
The Supreme Court doesn't decide many tax cases. They're usually not that interesting, and it's rare to see a split among the different circuits in a tax issue. However, a very important tax case will be decided in the next Supreme Court term (beginn... [Read More]

Tracked on May 21, 2007 11:19:52 PM

Comments