TaxProf Blog

Editor: Paul L. Caron
Pepperdine University School of Law

A Member of the Law Professor Blogs Network

Tuesday, August 8, 2006

Blattmachr & Gans on Family Limited Partnership Formation

Ssrn_104Jonathan G. Blattmachr (Milbank, Tweed, Hadley & McCloy, New York), Mitchell M. Gans (Hofstra) have posted Family Limited Partnership Formation: Dueling Dicta, 34 Cap. U. L. Rev. ___ (2006), on SSRN.  Here is the abstract:

The IRS has has invoked two gift-tax weapons in its attack on family limited partnerships: the gift-on-formation and indirect-gift arguments. While the former argument has thus far not enjoyed any success in the courts, the latter argument has been embraced by the Tax Court and the Eleventh Circuit in Shepherd and by the Eighth Circuit in Senda. Until the Eighth Circuit decision in Senda, taxpayers were able to navigate easily the indirect-gift argument by properly: sequencing the formation of the partnership and the gift of the partnership interest; or reflecting in the parent's capital account his or her contribution to the partnership. The Eighth Circuit has, however, in dicta, suggested that the indirect-gift argument can be applied in conjunction with the step transaction doctrine in order to deny discount. This article explores the partnership-formation process in light of Senda and the Eleventh Circuit's contrary dicta in Shepherd.

http://taxprof.typepad.com/taxprof_blog/2006/08/blattmachr_gans.html

Scholarship | Permalink

TrackBack URL for this entry:

http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c4eab53ef00d8353165c253ef

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Blattmachr & Gans on Family Limited Partnership Formation:

Comments

The IRS treatment on Family Limited Partnerships has changed significantly since the writing of this article. In the case of
the estate of webster kelley, deceased, john louden and patricia louden, personal respresentatives, petitioner v. comissioner of internal revenue, respondent the court found that the cash assets of the Family Limited Partnership could be discounted 25%. It still is wise to be careful in ensuring that a valid reason beyond estate tax evasion for the partnership to exist.

Posted by: Chen | Jun 25, 2008 1:11:42 AM