« More on the Fat Tax | Main | Staudt Presents Auditing the Court: Congressional Oversight of Supreme Court Decision-Making Today at Florida State »
January 19, 2006
Should Tenured Law Profs Stop Writing Law Review Articles?
A post by Rosa Brooks (Virginia) on the new LawCulture Blog, Goodbye to Law Reviews?, has caused a kerfuffle in the law prof blogosphere for her suggestion that she may stop publishing law review articles now that she has tenure. For some of the reactions, see:
- Mark Fenster (Florida)
- Paul Horwitz (Southwestern)
- Orin Kerr (George Washington)
- Ethan Leib (Hastings)
- Jim Maule (Villanova)
- Larry Ribstein (Illinois)
- Dan Solove (George Washington)
For Professor Brooks' follow-up post, see here. (Professor Brooks also caused quite a stir recently by raising in an L.A. Times op-ed the possibility of impeaching President Bush for approving wiretaps of Americans with ties to al Qaeda.)
January 19, 2006 in Law School | Permalink
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c4eab53ef00d834728f8053ef
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Should Tenured Law Profs Stop Writing Law Review Articles?:
Comments
Rather than clogging the comment pages, see
http://mauledagain.blogspot.com/2006_01_01_mauledagain_archive.html#113768770540111633
Posted by: Jim Maule | Jan 19, 2006 11:30:27 AM
Depends on how much they have to say.
Posted by: Robert Schwartz | Jan 20, 2006 1:29:19 AM
