TaxProf Blog

Editor: Paul L. Caron
Pepperdine University School of Law

A Member of the Law Professor Blogs Network

Sunday, November 27, 2005

Seago & Barkhi on The § 338(h)(10) Election

Tax_analysts_205 W. Eugene Seago (Virginia Tech University, Pamplin College of Business) & Reza Barkhi (Virginia Tech University, Pamplin College of Business) have published In the Process of Preventing Triple Taxation of a Subsidiary's Income, Congress Created a Great Indoor Game, 109 Tax Notes 1081 (Nov. 21, 2005), also available on the Tax Analysts web site as Doc 2005-22788, 2005 TNT 224-39.  Here is the abstract:

Seago and Barkhi analyze the § 338(h)(10) election to treat a parent's sale of a subsidiary as a sale of the subsidiary's assets. Because the buyer and the parent must enter into the election, the buyer is able to share in the relief from the triple taxation of the subsidiary's income that accrued while the parent owned the subsidiary. Further, by permitting the parent to make the election, instead of a joint election with the buyer, the parent could capture all of the relief from the triple taxation of the subsidiary's appreciation in value. The joint election enhances the tax benefits of the election, at the cost of government revenues, while reducing the parent's share of those benefits.

http://taxprof.typepad.com/taxprof_blog/2005/11/seago_barkhi_on.html

Scholarship | Permalink

TrackBack URL for this entry:

http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c4eab53ef00d834b2bf8769e2

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Seago & Barkhi on The § 338(h)(10) Election:

Comments

Does the h10 election have any impact on how the Buyer can amortize and/or (one-time) write-off the intangible portion of the purchase price and/or the FMV of the hard assests?

Posted by: Pat L. | Mar 21, 2006 6:16:32 AM