August 31, 2004
Graphing Your Political Philosophy
Tuesday, August 31, 2004
Law professor bloggers have taken to posting their scores on a political survey hosted by Chris Lightfoot that plots your position on left/right and idealistic/pragmatic axes. Some law prof notables (with figures on a -1 to +1 scale, where available):
• Ann Althouse (Wisconsin) is left of center and slightly pragmatic (near Tony Blair).You take the survey by answering 75 questions (Agree Strongly, Agree, No Opinion, Disagree, Disagree Strongly). Several of the questions are tax-related:
• Stephen Bainbridge (UCLA): is well right of center and slightly pragmatic, near Margaret Thatcher
• Kevin Heller (Georgia) is well left of center and slightly pragmatic (-0.5715 (left/right) and +0.0086 (idealistic/pragmatic)). (He proudly announced: "I'm to the Left of Everyone!")
• Mike Rappaport (San Diego) is right of center and pragmatic (+1.47 (left/right) and +3.49 (idealistic/pragmatic))
• Tung Yin (Iowa) is slightly right of center and pragmatic (+0.0291 (left/right) and +0.1949 (idealistic/pragmatic))
• It's more important to make the poor richer than to decrease the gap between rich and poor.For the record, I am almost exactly in the middle on the left/right axis and slightly idealistic (+0.0024 (left/right) and -0.0584 (idealistic/pragmatic)):
• Cutting taxes can't ever increase government revenue.
• Drivers shouldn't have to pay taxes to cover damage to the environment caused by motor transport, since that would price some people off the roads.
• The wealthy should pay a larger proportion of their income in tax than the poor.
• The government should raise revenue by taxing income rather than consumption.
TrackBack URL for this entry:
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Graphing Your Political Philosophy: